MCChris Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 Discuss: http://www.vulture.com/2018/05/rock-and-roll-hall-of-fame-artists-ranked-from-best-to-worst.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kizanski Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 10 minutes ago, MCChris said: Discuss: If shit-stirring was an Olympic sport, you would be Jesse Owens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cynic Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 It may say more about me than the maker of the list, but I've owned more music by the last ten than I have the top ten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuitarGuy65 Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 Cheap Trick at #107... Not too shabby! Of course, I'd have them in the top 100 but YMMV... 😎 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kizanski Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 9 minutes ago, GuitarGuy65 said: Cheap Trick at #107... Not too shabby! Of course, I'd have them in the top 100 but YMMV... 😎 All I need to know about the list without having read it that it's bullshit. If there are 214 artists on the list, Cheap Trick is #497. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCChris Posted May 11, 2018 Author Share Posted May 11, 2018 26 minutes ago, kizanski said: If shit-stirring was an Olympic sport, you would be Jesse Owens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockbody Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 Queen next to last? Pfft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCChris Posted May 11, 2018 Author Share Posted May 11, 2018 10 minutes ago, Lockbody said: Queen next to last? Pfft A sentiment echoed and endorsed by Wenner, I'm sure. On the entertainment desk at the college newspaper we had a reference book of Rolling Stone album reviews. Every Queen release got one star our of four or five. I remember being shocked at the level of disdain for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
currypowder Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 2 hours ago, kizanski said: If shit-stirring was an Olympic sport, you would be Jesse Owens. Said the pot to the kettle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kizanski Posted May 12, 2018 Share Posted May 12, 2018 11 minutes ago, currypowder said: Said the pot to the kettle. No argument there. But I didn't start the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stike Posted May 12, 2018 Share Posted May 12, 2018 I hate lists/rankings, it’s music not sports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stratacus Posted May 12, 2018 Share Posted May 12, 2018 6 minutes ago, Stike said: I hate lists/rankings, it’s music not sports. For the win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
veatch Posted May 12, 2018 Share Posted May 12, 2018 5 minutes ago, Stike said: I hate lists/rankings, it’s music not sports. I will put that in my top 10 of all times posts about music, just for the irony of it all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakeboy Posted May 12, 2018 Share Posted May 12, 2018 What a load of horseshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BadgerDave Posted May 12, 2018 Share Posted May 12, 2018 Obviously, Alice Cooper should be higher, Paul Simon should be lower, Randy Newman should be absent and the Ramones are just about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Haynie Posted May 12, 2018 Share Posted May 12, 2018 Without looking at the list I can already tell it will not be something for me to agree with. Those lists are always one person's opinion, or voted on more heavily by one age group than another. The influential artists get overlooked in favor of who was the best marketed. imdb.com used to have a somewhat useful list of the best movies of all time, but in recent years the latest "blockbuster" movies seen by people in their teens and twenties have been voted up in the top 250 movies of all time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BruceM Posted May 12, 2018 Share Posted May 12, 2018 15 hours ago, Lockbody said: Queen next to last? Pfft They're lucky they got in at all, as evidenced by this quote from the Bowie writeup. Pffft indeed. Where are my girly men in glittery outfits? "Note that, besides the undeniable Bowie and cuddly Elton John, the hall has been very wary of the effete and glam side of rock — no Todd Rundgren, no Dolls, no Mott, no Roxy Music, no Pet Shop, no Marc Bolan, and stretching all the way to the Smiths and Joy Division — while just about every hirsute assemblage of spandexed wankers from that era and every one since have been ushered right in. It’s obvious that the hall has “issues.” " Edited to add: Not that there's anything wrong with a spandexed wanker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kizanski Posted May 12, 2018 Share Posted May 12, 2018 ...and @MCChris' mission is accomplished - lol! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCChris Posted May 12, 2018 Author Share Posted May 12, 2018 32 minutes ago, Ed Rechts said: We can don loin cloths, wield K-bars, and jump into The Pit of Final Determination to decide the appropriate postioning of these many esteemed acts, but I'm pretty sure all of us can reach accord that not only does Bon Jovi not belong on this chart, but their performance at their inauguration flat out sucked so bad Why exactly does Bon Jovi not belong on this list? Serious question, BTW. Assuming the main criticism is the band's music isn't substantive enough, how is it less so than Frankie and the Teenagers? If it's about influence, how is Bon Jovi less influential than, say, Steve Miller? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakeboy Posted May 12, 2018 Share Posted May 12, 2018 1 hour ago, Ed Rechts said: We can don loin cloths, wield K-bars, and jump into The Pit of Final Determination to decide the appropriate postioning of these many esteemed acts, but I'm pretty sure all of us can reach accord that not only does Bon Jovi not belong on this chart, but their performance at their inauguration flat out sucked so bad Sambora seemed to play his parts well and he sure grabbed the 80s tone! JBJ didn’t age as well if that performance is indicative. His vocals sounded so very flat. Everything else sounded fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCChris Posted May 12, 2018 Author Share Posted May 12, 2018 2 hours ago, Ed Rechts said: They're not, The whole RRHF institution is a corporate circle-jerk fiasco, with expensive parking and dusty artifacts . All the more reason to include Bon Jovi, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.