Jump to content
Hamer Fan Club Message Center

BadgerDave

Supporter
  • Posts

    4,722
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Posts posted by BadgerDave

  1. Having heard "no" from the folks at Hamer a few times, I just assume that Jol has his reasons and move on.

    Sometimes he doesn't want to revisit old concepts (no FBs or "beer" guitars) sometimes its a production issue (no reverse victory inlays) and sometimes he won't build something that he does not believe fits with Hamer's current image or Jol's personal design or aesthetic tolerances.

    That's a diplomatic way of saying that Jol won't put the Hamer name on something he considers "butt ugly". Regardless of how much a customer wants it or how much someone is willing to pay.

  2. I am talking about the "ugly", non-pointy headstock they used in early 80’s Vectors. I'm glad there are other people on this boat, because if there's enough interest on that headstock shape then maybe they would bring it back.

    I haven't heard anyone else promoting that headstock as desirable on a Vector. Or any other non-traditional LP Special derived body shape. Except for one very adamant ebay seller who was trying to promote it as "adding value" to a Blitz.

    You're certainly entitled to your opinion, but I think the line is going to be pretty short to board that bandwagon.

    Good luck, though, today's "no" often turns into tomorrow's "yes" with Hamer.

  3. I have all the right keywords on eBay to notify me if one ever pops up, but I should have missed that one because it was listed only for the United States -- and I live in Canada. In addition, "SELL ONLY IN THE US. (...) Paypal only. Paypal users must have confirmed address or I'll refuse payment." normally voids me from bidding, because you can ship my stuff to my friend in Vermont, US, but of course her address is not my confirmed PayPal address -- this could work only with sellers who are HFC members and know me well.

    Besides, which

    That one was pretty heavily boogered for the price. Refin, repro logo, Gibson pickups, cracks, etc. I can't imagine a solid all original one going for a whole lot more than that. Good luck in your quest, I wouldn't lose any sleep over that one.

  4. Good Lord. Is it that difficult to type the words "to be"?

    "The guitar's nut needs replaced" ?????

    No, dipshit, the nut needs TO BE replaced. It's called English and it's a language taught in most schools here in the United States.

    I suppose the guitar is very "resonate" too.

    Prolly.

    BTW, nice paint job.

    Edited to clarify that my use of the term "dipshit" is directed toward the seller, not vockins.

  5. Can't let one of these threads go by without mentioning the two best (IMO) power pop bands of the 80's.

    Off Broadway (usa)

    and

    20/20

    Off Broadway got very close to the big time and released a pair of great albums on Atlantic (IIRC). They had a minor hit with "Stay in Time". One of the best lead singer/lead guitar combos I've heard in Cliff Johnson and John Ivan. The band was managed by Cheap Trick's manager, Ken Adamany who dumped them just as they started getting some traction in favor of southern rock outfit called "Little Dixie". I was fortunate to be at the "post dump" show at Headliner's in Madison. It was a fantastic, obscenity-laden, drunkfest on stage. At one point, Cliff was riding a guitar stand hobby-horse style and shouting "How 'bout that Little Dixie - yee haw!" Not particularly professional, but fun as hell.

    20/20 wrote some of the best songs to come out of that era including 'Remember the Lightning, Yellow Pills, Cheri and She's an Obsession".

  6. Which one do you like better?

    The '65 :lol:

    Edited to add:

    I'm going on vacation beginning Thursday of next week (5/10), so I won't be able to answer questions (or ship the guitar) after early next week. So, HURRY! LIMITED TIME OFFER, ACT NOW!!!!!!

    :)

    Seriously, the Nash or the USA Reissue?

    The Nash. By a hair. Mostly because it's unique and a little strange. That appeals to me.

    The Fender is more refined. The Nash is kinda' punk.

  7. I AGREE. Also the seafoam fender looks fantastic too. But I´m into vintage guitars these days. So should you come across a vintage Fender JM or a Hamer Special I´d be very happy to know...

    Listening to the new "Dinosaur Jr" makes me wanna own a matching headstock vintage JM...Arrrgghhh..

    J M ascis J azz M aster...

    Vintage Jazzmasters are easy to find. All of the big vintage dealers have them. Unfortunately, prices have gone from $2,000.00 to $5,00.00 and up in less than a year. $5K could still be a bargain, though. IMO, they are one of the last "great" vintage guitars that are still (relatively) affordable.

  8. How´s that Nash Jazzmaster?

    I haven´t heard much about them so far but that one looks cool!

    The Nash is very different from the USA Reissue. Sort of like comparing a Cadillac to a Lotus. The Nash is stripped down, bare bones and a lot of fun. The sounds are similar, but the feel isn't. The Nash is lighter and it feels like a pair of old blue jeans. Either you like Bill Nash's "artistry" or you don't. I think he goes a bit overboard with the relicing, but I appreciate this JM for what it is. Most, but not all, of the finish has been removed from the back of the neck and it feels perfect. Pickups are Seymour Duncan Quarter Pounder JM models. The tremolo is functional, but not as smooth as a genuine Fender model.

    Nash has only made a handful of Jazzmasters. I suspect that this is the only burgundy mist one. The headstock is painted to match the body. I understand that this is somewhat rare on a Nash.

  9. P2110021.jpg

    JM32.jpg

    Recent Fender ’62 USA Reissue Jazzmaster in seafoam green. My acquisition of a ’65 JM makes this one redundant, so I thought I’d offer it here first. Sorry for the crappy photos. They make the guitar look more Daphne blue, but in person, it is definitely seafoam. I can take more to order if you’re interested. Completely stock except for the addition of a pearl pickguard and a Buzzstop. Excellent condition, looks new except for one tiny chip on the back/bottom edge. I owned the guitar for a week before I noticed it. Precision setup for low action, no buzzes and great tone. Original white pickguard and original Fender brown/yellow plush hard shell case included. Comes with a big bag of Fender Factory tags, strap, etc. Light for a JM, about 8 lbs. Sounds like a great JM should.

    $1,000.00 shipped, lower 48. I’ll ship just about anywhere else (even Canada!) at actual cost. Add 3% for PayPal.

    PM or email at: dave.owenATgeDOTcom

  10. Dave,

    what makes it superior to the newport 12 you tried?

    also what is this flip flop finish?

    it looks like candy apple green to me too. it can look green or sparkly turquoiseish depending on the lighting

    Gus, IMO, the Newport 12 was close to perfect, but it had a few features that I would have changed, including the all maple body and top and the bridge. Mine souded just a bit too bright and a little unfocused. The bridge on mine developed a tendency to vibrate (as did the toggle switch). In contrast, the Eclipse sounds "woodier" has more mids, a tighter low end and clearer highs. Plus the bridge is rock solid. I also like the compact body on the Eclipse. Of course, my opinion is based on just one example of the Newport 12 and a couple of Eclipses. YMMV.

    The flip flop finish is VERY similar to the candy green and you're right about the candy green looking slightly turquoise in certain light. The flip flop differs in that it turns a distinctly different shade of bright blue as you move it in the light. The effect is not at all subtle. I'm just speculating here, but perhaps the flip flop finish is the unintended result of a slightly different clearcoat used in '95 that has yellowed over time?

  11. steve, dave,

    mine was 540600 and i got it from minnesota. the finish marks i speak of were under the clear and real hard to notice (under certain angles only). i only noticed them months into owning the guitar.

    Gus,

    I checked the serial number on mine. It is the same guitar that you owned. It took awhile, but I think I spotted the "pizza fingers". There's a smudge on the heel of the neck. Great guitar, BTW. After trying a couple of Ricks, an old Fender, a Newport 12 and some others, I'm convinced that the Eclipse 12 is THE perfect 12 string electric.

  12. Here's a photo of the flip/flop Eclipse 6 that I used to own:

    1119383358414_BGafc2.jpg

    I don't remember if it was a '95, but I may be able to dig up a photo of the serial # tonight.

    My Eclipse 12 is the more common metallic candy green finish. No finish issues on the back, so I'm guessing it's different from your old one, Gus.

    Eclipses are great guitars and becoming harder to find every day. I doubt Greg's will be available for long.

  13. If this is the flip/flop finish, there's a 2TEK Cruise on the bay now with that finish. I had an Eclipse 12 (that is now owned by BroChris) in that same finish. Other than this Eclipse and now that 2TEK, I've not seen any other Hamers done in this finish and it is not in any catalogs or spec sheets. IIRC these were done in 1995 and my guess is that the serial numbers are all pretty close. Very cool.

    There's at least one more. I had it for a while and, IIRC, it now resides with TomTerrific (BD scratches his head wondering if the onset of Alzheimers has begun). Very cool finish.

×
×
  • Create New...