Jump to content
Hamer Fan Club Message Center

crunchee

Members
  • Posts

    8,776
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

crunchee last won the day on June 21

crunchee had the most liked content!

2 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

8,671 profile views

crunchee's Achievements

Veteran HFCer

Veteran HFCer (4/4)

6.2k

Reputation

  1. They lost me when I found out Crypto wasn't just the name of Superman's dog.
  2. Sorry for the delay in responding, I forgot how crazy the Holiday season is, and trying to get anything done that isn't Holiday-related! I think I'm sufficiently recovered from the last week to get back to topic. The pickups sound great for the most part, the SSL-5 in the bridge gives added punch and gain as expected, but it's subtle...if you want more than that, you might want a stacked PU or a standard-sized Humbucker PU in the bridge position. The neck PU was a bit of a surprise, as it's beefy and full sounding, but I dunno if the neck pickup is supposed to be an equivalent to a 'Fat '50's' Strat neck PU or not. This guitar has the 'Gilmour switch' to bring in the neck PU along with the middle and bridge PU, which adds fullness and makes the overall sound darker when the 'Gilmour switch' is engaged. I like it as an additional 'flavor'! In general, all of these pickups seem to bring added presence and clarity, as you might expect from 'Custom Shop' PUs. The only thing I wish the previous owner(s) had done would be to make the first tone control work for the bridge PU (like it does for the middle PU) instead of not, even though not having that tone control work for the bridge PU is the 'traditional' wiring for Strats, apparently. But it should be an easy fix, and I can live without it in the meantime. This guitar has had some 'aftermarket add-ons' before I got it, obviously...such as the one-ply acrylic black pickguard with 'Gilmour switch' installed, which I strongly suspect was sourced from this parts seller (no affiliation, BTW): https://www.stratcat.biz/black_strat_parts.shtml ~plus, the standard cast Fender tuning machines were replaced (by a previous owner, again) with 6-in-a-line Kluson reissues, which were expertly installed, and holds tuning very well...other than the very faint outlines of the original tuner post bushings on the front of the headstock, I can't tell that anything else was ever on this guitar! I wouldn't change any thing back to stock original, especially since none of these changes were/are apparently cheap. This guitar came to me from DGS with heavy strings, I have no idea what the gauges were but I also strongly suspect that they were in the neighborhood of a .011 set (on a Fender scale, I usually play a .009 set), and the trem was adjusted tight/flat with no 'float' whatsoever. The pickups were also adjusted weirdly, with the treble side of the PUs adjusted much higher than the bass sides, which were lowered nearly as low as they could go into the pickguard. It makes me wonder if DGS actually did anything to the setup, like they say they supposedly do in their website to all their guitars! Which brings me to something else that strikes me as kinda weird...it's a 12-year old guitar (according to the S/N), but has practically no signs of being played much if at all, including very little fret wear. In the end, it doesn't really matter as I changed the strings to .009s and set it up the way I wanted to anyway, and now it's a keeper! As far as which one is better, this particular Strat, or the Strat I also recently got from DGS with the '69 CS PUs and Callaham Strat Bridge installed? It doesn't really matter to me as now I have two different flavors of Strats to choose from! The 'Gilmour' style Strat is best to me for higher-gain Rawk-type playing, but the other Strat excels at chimey, jangly, twangy, poppy playing...even Surf, if I wanna go there. I like 'em both! Funny thing is, I'm not a Strat guy (or at least I don't think I am), but if I have to have two, these'll do me very well. BTW, this particular model MIM Strat seems to me to be one of the longest-running 'Special Edition' Fender guitars that I'm aware of...not really too much of a surprise, considering the 'Gilmour-like' cosmetics (maple neck with a small Strat headstock on a black Strat body, black 3-ply pickguard, with 'aged' cream-colored knobs and PU covers...it's not like Fender had to spend extra money and scrounge for parts), plus Fender didn't have to make much effort to make it a 'Special Edition' in the first place. The only thing Fender changed was around 2018, when they went from the 6-screw 'Vintage' style trem to a 2-post trem. There's tons of these 'Black Strats' out there on the market, most of which have not been modified, so don't spend a Grand for a stock used one!
  3. And solidbody Teles in general. I don't think anyone would enjoy being hit with one to the head edgewise, ax-style.
  4. Cool color, it reminds me of similar 'burst color Harmony-made Silvertones from the '60's. Of course, this one's better!
  5. Cool looking guitar, GLWTS! BTW, if I didn't post this here, somebody else woulda:
  6. Uh oh, somebody done P.O. the Swifties in Tennessee: https://www.tennessean.com/story/money/2022/11/16/taylor-swift-ticketmaster-issues-presale-event-tennessee-attorney-general-consumer-protection-laws/69653646007/
  7. You've probably already heard about this happening already, but just in case.... From CNN Business: https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/15/business/ticketmaster-taylor-swift-tickets The author of the nightly CNN Business Nightcap article that I get in my email (it covers pretty much the same info the CNN Business website does, except it's a little more fun to read) ended this story with her observation: Quote: "My solution to this dilemma is I that I only listen to music made between the early 1990s and late 2000s, and refuse to attend events where large crowds of youths are likely to gather. It's a life hack that everyone over the age of 30 should try." End quote. Hell, I've been doing THAT (with the music period adjusted accordingly for my own frame of reference, of course) for at least the last twenty years!
  8. Once someone reaches a certain age, It's time to quit trying to recreate this video:
  9. Are you sure those pickups are Dynasonics? To me, they look like uncovered P-90s with a metal surround, from looking at the pole pieces and the two mounting screws. The Equitz website doesn't give any info.
  10. No affiliation, for those of you who like these: https://reverb.com/news/strandberg-opens-a-reverb-shop
  11. Just to mention, the AA964 Vibrolux Reverb circuit and the AA964 Princeton circuit are two different animals, and very different from each other: http://www.prowessamplifiers.com/schematics/fender/Vibrolux_Reverb_aa964-Layout.html http://www.prowessamplifiers.com/schematics/fender/Princeton_aa964-Schematic.html Fender as a company was constantly tweaking the circuits on the amp line back when the Blackface amp line was being manufactured, and there was a total of three different Blackface era schematics/numbers assigned for the Blackface-era Vibrolux Reverb circuit, see the 'Production Years' info found just under the photos on the top of this website: http://fenderguru.com/amps/vibrolux/ Here's the Marsh catalog listing and description for their Springfield Reverb amp, my guess is that they chose to build the amp circuit they thought sounded best: http://store.marshamps.com/product_info.php?cPath=49&products_id=369&osCsid=4e2c5f87a1fad43bf27e93e0be69d6be
  12. "The Best one you'll ever find-L@@K!" header seems to me to be too much of a Carny 'come on' meant for N@@Bs, as usual.
×
×
  • Create New...