Didn't watch the video, just listened to it once -as I'm at job right now. I liked better the sound of the second guitar. It's fuller, has more dynamics and more "focus"... So, whatever it was, I think I prefer it.
Have I (or my ears) betrayed Hamer?
Well it is a well though off guitar for sure. Maybe other Hamer's would fair better with you.
OK, here's what happened: I thought "the second guitar" started after 2:30, as there's a pause. Wasn't watching it, so after a couple of more minutes I just said "this is it, I have a winner" and closed the web browser. This means I never got hear the Ibanez. /emoticons/default_smile.png
Now I'm at home and watched the video until the end. The sound of the Ibanez sucks. The Diablo wins BIG time.
I would do the same, I guess he just wanted to change camera angles.
I like versatile guitars that are thick but can be shaped and don't have an after taste. Just raw, thick and pleasing.
Just wanted to add the advertisement of the Diablo's from 96.
It's difficult to read but the Alder bodied, Maple Neck with Rosewood Fretted Diablo's were priced the same due to equal manufacturing costs. . Both had Dimarzio's - a Norton Lite and a Pro Zone, but the Diablo II had the additional SM2 and 5 way switch. So it looks like playing the neck pickup on the I and II should sound about the same. I am looking to buy one, so either one would do the trick /emoticons/default_smile.png