Yeah, I remember they seemed kind of interesting. Ever tried one? They couldn't have sold too well, only made for around maybe 5 years I think.What...no love for the Nighthawks?
That's the one. Small LP inspired design. Loads of tones. For me, the neck was too narrow. And they were going after Fender. But most people, if they want a Fender sound, will just buy a Fender. Brand loyalty in the guitar world is an odd thing. They didn't sell too many of them.Yeah, I remember they seemed kind of interesting. Ever tried one? They couldn't have sold too well, only made for around maybe 5 years I think.What...no love for the Nighthawks?
If I remember right, they had like, 11 pickup positions? lol, maybe they had to many options. Well, I may be exaggerating but they were advertised as being super versatile and capable of a twangy sound. Maybe they were trying to go after the Fender crowd a little bit.
rob
Lotsa love for the Nighthawk AND the Blueshawk. The Nighthawk I own has a neck mini-hum a middle single coil and a slanted hum in the bridge. Between those pups, a 5-pos switch, and a push/pul tone pot you have perhaps too many choicesl It definitely breaks out of the usual Gibson mold with those electronics, tummy cut, 25.5" scale, and a Strat style hardtail.What...no love for the Nighthawks?
i have a 63......and i love it!!!!!melody makers (joan jett) are still affordable. even sg jr's are goin up.... because its an sg? early eighties LP's and explorers (no trems) are good solid fiddles as well. but in the sixties, melody makers are still cheap