Well, the price issue comes down to Business 101. From what I understand Hamer does not crank out tons of guitars - just a few a day, right? Well, any business man who detects a void left by Gibson's screwup (and there will be a void - the size of it is what's to be debated) will predict more demand. With more demand you can either raise prices, crank up production (and, in this case lower quality), or both. To do nothing, given the increased market pressure, wouldn't make sense and would get you a "D" grade in Business 101. We'll see how things unfold. I know that Gibson is THE BRAND but one must wonder how long subpar quality will be tolerated by the market. My own opinion (and, everybody's got one of those) is that the guitar-buying masses will still clamor for Gibsons becuase their old heros played one no matter how poor the quality becomes. And, honestly, 95% of the guitar-buying public couldn't tell the difference between a $300 Memphis Les Paul copy and a Gibson if they were blindfolded. Thanks for reading my meaningless blather...