Jump to content
Hamer Fan Club Message Center

PSA: Roy Clark's Guitars


Recommended Posts

Posted

Dang. I’d hit that Alvarez 12ver in a New York minute if I didn’t have something similar ( and cooler...) in transit. 

Posted
On 4/19/2020 at 11:40 PM, RobB said:

Dang. I’d hit that Alvarez 12ver in a New York minute if I didn’t have something similar ( and cooler...) in transit. 

Be careful what you offer that guy....my "new" 12ver arrives today.  

Posted
4 minutes ago, cynic said:

Be careful what you offer that guy....my "new" 12ver arrives today.  

Did you get it? It's a great deal. Those K. Yairis are solid instruments!

Posted

Excuse my ignorance.  "Gibson Roy Clark Owned Les Paul 1952 Goldtop (1956 conversion)"  What does conversion mean.  I always thought a conversion was when you routed out a P-90 guitar for humbuckers but this one still  has P-90's in it?

Posted
24 minutes ago, dhuber said:

Excuse my ignorance.  "Gibson Roy Clark Owned Les Paul 1952 Goldtop (1956 conversion)"  What does conversion mean.  I always thought a conversion was when you routed out a P-90 guitar for humbuckers but this one still  has P-90's in it?

The original Les Paul guitars were goldtops with P-90 pickups, but came with a trapeze style tailpiece and (I understand) a different neck angle. All of which made them harder to intonate and play, to put it mildly. The 1956 model had the two piece bridge and tune-a-matic set up, like modern LPs. If I am not mistaken, there was also an interim model with a wrap tailpiece. Probably about 1954(?)

The conversion consisted of replacing the hardware to convert to the more usable '56 setup.

 

Posted

It seems that this 52-to-56 LP has a wrong neck. If I'm not mistaken, the face of the headstock has to have holly wood veneer, which is much lighter color  than mahogany and you always see light color line going around headstock. This one clearly does not have one.

No veneer
375549014_noveneer.jpg.fc670b962a863b446b4b9eab32bc3019.jpg 

 

This one is original 52

veneer.jpg.32cf87193407958d0efb8c3d75913a6d.jpg

Posted

Could it just be the veneer chipped off in that spot and the headstock's been touched up?  That looks close enough to 0.03" to make sense.

image.png

Posted

It's not easy to chip off holly wood veneer. After all, that veneer piece is glued dead, not like a plywood, where the top layer can come off any time.  Of course there is a possibility that it chipped off, but I'd say no. And there is something wrong with the whole headstock shape ...something is not kosher with that neck to my opinion

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...