JohnnyThunders Posted July 25, 2007 Posted July 25, 2007 hey...whas' that on Joan's pickguard? Two girls holdin' hands? Is she a lesbian. No. Noway. Really? Noway. It's just an image thing. I think she goes both ways. You might get lucky.She is 100% lesbian just has kept it underwraps.
BCR Greg Posted July 25, 2007 Posted July 25, 2007 Cars look like shit without paint, so the argument is moot, Bubba!!!! If Joan Jett wanted to blow me, I'd let her. I'd just squint and pretend she was Winona Ryder.
Matt Mattson Posted July 25, 2007 Posted July 25, 2007 Cars look like shit without paint, so the argument is moot, Bubba!!!! If Joan Jett wanted to blow me, I'd let her. I'd just squint and pretend she was Winona Ryder. I'm just trying to figure out why Joan Jett would want to blow you when she's got Carmen Electra to blow . . .
MCChris Posted July 25, 2007 Posted July 25, 2007 My dick's bigger.The only instance in which such a statement would be accurate.
BubbaVO Posted July 25, 2007 Author Posted July 25, 2007 Cars look like shit without paint, so the argument is moot, Bubba!!!!Lost me there ... to follow your thinking then we need to make sure that we only see the Joan when she's "detailed". I've provided those. She's not bad. The shots of her during / after a concert - that's like taking a picture of car after running it in a demolition derby. There's no woman who'd look good after that. Of course if you're Kiz, then you're happy so long as the silicon hasn't leaked.
kizanski Posted July 25, 2007 Posted July 25, 2007 Cars look like shit without paint, so the argument is moot, Bubba!!!!Lost me there ... to follow your thinking then we need to make sure that we only see the Joan when she's "detailed". I've provided those. She's not bad. The shots of her during / after a concert - that's like taking a picture of car after running it in a demolition derby. There's no woman who'd look good after that. Of course if you're Kiz, then you're happy so long as the silicon hasn't leaked.Dude, she's a hag. Face it.On her best day in her prime, at the hight of her popularity (read: 20 years ago), she was a flat-chested heroin chic, tomboy without an ounce of sexuality.She's spent.Let it go.
BCR Greg Posted July 25, 2007 Posted July 25, 2007 What do you really think?Don't sugarcoat it, let it out.
Matt Mattson Posted July 25, 2007 Posted July 25, 2007 My dick's bigger.The only instance in which such a statement would be accurate.Not bigger than Joan Jetts' . . . She can strap on any size she wants.
BubbaVO Posted July 25, 2007 Author Posted July 25, 2007 Dude, she's a hag. Face it.On her best day in her prime, at the hight of her popularity (read: 20 years ago), she was a flat-chested heroin chic, tomboy without an ounce of sexuality.She's spent.Let it go.Kiz - The premise was hot 48 year olds. Kind of a tongue in cheek thing to begin with. Sorry to cause you agita. See ya around.
kizanski Posted July 25, 2007 Posted July 25, 2007 Kiz - The premise was hot 48 year olds. Kind of a tongue in cheek thing to begin with. Sorry to cause you agita. See ya around.I understand the premise. However Joan Jett does not apply.
BubbaVO Posted July 25, 2007 Author Posted July 25, 2007 The real kicker here is that I never have these kind of debates outside a bar and after my second bottle of Chimay Grand Reserve (blue bottle). Perhaps that's why Joan doesn't look so bad.
MTM105 Posted July 25, 2007 Posted July 25, 2007 Joan Jett recently fired off this open letter to Rolling Stone magazine as a protest to their Women of Rock issue.I tried to find some cleverly worded way to express my disgust with your "Women in Rock" issue, but what i have to say is really quite simple: You guys are completely retarded. By RS standards, Rock is no longer a style of music but a trendy costume to be whipped up by expensive stylists and slapped onto the latest pop tart barbie doll. Give a girl some tight pants and a spiky bracelet and POOF! She ROCKS! Your poor choice of cover girls and featured artists brings to mind the Sports Illustrated swimsuit editions. There is nothing necessarily wrong with the breast-baring models inside..but we all understand that they have NOTHING TO DO WITH SPORTS--Which just might be offensive to women who are interested in sports or who might even be (gasp) real athletes. Yes, Britney has a talented stylist and yes, somebody gave Shakira a Guns & Roses t-shirt to wear..but they ARE NOT NOW NOR WILL THEY EVER BE ROCK. Maybe it's naive of me to expect any glimmer of rock'n'roll credibility OR respect for women from a magazine whose cover shot is regularly a naked underweight actress. The thing is , I AM a woman musician with a rock band, and as we all are I am STARVED for any little crumb of recognition that real women rockers might be thrown. So like a sucker I find myself short another five bucks ..and pissed enough to write my first letter to an editor. Avril Lavigne gets some studded accessories from Hot Topic so now she's "upholding the brazen tradition of teenage outrage"???!! Are you SERIOUS? And could someone please explain to me why people keep insisting on referring to PINK as rock? Wasn't she doing the white girl hip hop thing a minute ago? Yeah, she performed on the Aerosmith tribute show --big deal..she was on the Janet Jackson tribute show just before that--Whatever's trendy. WHO CARES. She's a Spice Girl reject...but I digress. Jewel and Mandy friggin' Moore have full page features as Rock Icons...Meanwhile Joan Jett gets one line. ONE LINE. Joan Jett & the Blackhearts, who have never stopped touring, recently did 10 days in the Middle East playing for the troops stationed in Afghanistan. In AFGHANISTAN, Joan would come onstage wearing a birkha, which she ripped off and stomped on before blazing through the purest and nastiest rock show ANYWHERE. But even in the RS WOMEN IN ROCK issue, a story like that gets ONE SENTENCE on the bottom of the last page of Random Notes. Britney's Rock credentials? Well, she butchers the song "I Love Rock'n'Roll" on her latest record, and when asked about it the genius replies "Well, I've always loved Pat Benatar." And SHE is your Rock issue cover girl?? You should be REALLY embarrassed. Sleater Kinney was the only rock group listed on the cover..and they got only half a page. Ashanti, the r&b back up singer who can't seem to do anything without "featuring Jah Rule," has two pages. What about the Donnas? The Yeah Yeah Yeahs? The Distillers? A mag like RS has the power to shine important light on groups like these--instead they are afterthoughts, and that valuable spotlight is wasted on the same overexposed pop princesses WHO HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH ROCK. In your own letter from the editor you have the hypocritical balls to say "rock radio won't touch female artists, while the pop factory keeps churning out soundalike clones, and ambitious musicians with something to say find themselves left out in the cold." The pages that follow those words are a blatant display that Rolling Stone magazine is happily working for the factory now too. If the issue had been called "Women in Music"..or maybe "Some Cute Girls with Top 10 Records out Right Now"..I would have no beef with it. Corny as it may sound, ROCK is something which is still meaningful and even sacred to some of us. Use the word "rock" in bold letters next to a picture of Britney Fucking Spears, and you're turning your whole publication into a joke...and an offensive joke at that.
blackfbiv Posted July 25, 2007 Posted July 25, 2007 Joan Jett recently fired off this open letter to Rolling Stone magazine as a protest to their Women of Rock issue.Claws out...Hello Hitty...Meee-owwwwch!Dion
vockins Posted July 26, 2007 Posted July 26, 2007 Joan Jett kicks 100% ass. She is the Real Rock And Roll Deal. She's a thousand times hotter than some vapid LA blonde silcone dime a dozen airbrush strip mall tart that's got nothing going on but a $15,000 nose job. If she were into dudes, I'd be all over that in a minute. She's not, and that's fantastic.
Brooks Posted July 26, 2007 Posted July 26, 2007 that letter kicks ass! i don't think joan's hot, or like her music, but she is RAWK and not a poser, and that letter hit the nail right on the fookin head!
MCChris Posted July 26, 2007 Posted July 26, 2007 You guys are completely retarded.I'd think a lesbian would be above using such slurs. Besides, "you guys have your fuckin' heads up your fuckin' asses" would be a much more punk rock way to put it.
BubbaVO Posted July 26, 2007 Author Posted July 26, 2007 She don't got big tits, but when it comes to integrity she's got JUGS!
Willie G. Moseley Posted July 26, 2007 Posted July 26, 2007 Let me attempt to bring the topic back to pseudo-intellectual credibility by inquiring how many movies Cherie Currie has appeared nekkid in.
Matt Mattson Posted July 26, 2007 Posted July 26, 2007 Let me attempt to bring the topic back to pseudo-intellectual credibility by inquiring how many movies Cherie Currie has appeared nekkid in.http://www.chainsawchick.com/Just what I need at this point in life, a chick with a chain-saw.
BubbaVO Posted July 26, 2007 Author Posted July 26, 2007 Let me attempt to bring the topic back to pseudo-intellectual credibility by inquiring how many movies Cherie Currie has appeared nekkid in.http://www.chainsawchick.com/Just what I need at this point in life, a chick with a chain-saw.Woah! Hot blonde. Dangerous tools. Big Arms and Shoulders. Plays Guitar. Rides a Bike. Chesty - like Kiz likes 'em. I think we'll have consensus - Caramba!
Matt Mattson Posted July 26, 2007 Posted July 26, 2007 Yeah, and if Kiz messes with that one he might just wind up like Bobitt: on all fours out on the lawn trying to find his prick before the dog does . . .
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.