eightyfour Posted March 25, 2010 Posted March 25, 2010 Anybody know what if any the technical differences are between the 58 and 59 reissues?
jisham Posted March 25, 2010 Posted March 25, 2010 58s will have a bigger neck profile and unless the 58 was made in the early 2000s, it will have a plaintop.
eightyfour Posted March 26, 2010 Author Posted March 26, 2010 Between $1,500 and $2,500, usually. That seems to be about it. GT 57's and you pocket another 500.
jisham Posted March 26, 2010 Posted March 26, 2010 Between $1,500 and $2,500, usually. Well, that too!
Brownsound Posted May 5, 2010 Posted May 5, 2010 57Ri is the best bang for the buck, un-relieved body, classic looks, fantastic sound and I love the 50's neck profile. I love mine!
serial Posted May 5, 2010 Posted May 5, 2010 I'm not a huge fan of the LPF-wayyyyy too corksniffery and attitudinal for my surfing pleasure. YMMV, but I find the Mylespaulforum a bit more user-friendly, even if they do have a higher percentage of Harmony Central kids there.
cmatthes Posted May 5, 2010 Posted May 5, 2010 I refuse to darken the door of the LPF. More douchebaggery than corksniffery. MLP Forum is much more tolerable - cool, and has way less of the Agile-slinging Harmony Central children there than TGP.
murkat Posted May 5, 2010 Posted May 5, 2010 diffs~topsweightprice.slight neck carve diff.all else the same.
gregc Posted May 6, 2010 Posted May 6, 2010 yea, I think the max body blank weight on the R9 is 1lb. less than the R8.
Brownsound Posted May 10, 2010 Posted May 10, 2010 I refuse to darken the door of the LPF. More douchebaggery than corksniffery. MLP Forum is much more tolerable - cool, and has way less of the Agile-slinging Harmony Central children there than TGP. Here here! I frequented that furniture collection group but couldnt handle the idiots. Guys would go on and on about how a vintage guitar looked but it seemed that sound was secondary. Not only do all LPs sound different, a lot of them didnt sound worth a shite. An old LP in pristine condition tells me that someone didnt think enough about the sound to play it much...
cynic Posted May 10, 2010 Posted May 10, 2010 I particularly get a kick out of the ones paying another 20% of the total cost of their guitar to "upgrade" their plastics to an agreed upon "better" replica.
Brownsound Posted May 10, 2010 Posted May 10, 2010 I particularly get a kick out of the ones paying another 20% of the total cost of their guitar to "upgrade" their plastics to an agreed upon "better" replica.Or how they pay a buttload of money to have them "Murphy'd" or aged. Its hillarious!"Oooh look everybody! My guitar looks just like a real musician played really hard for a long time!"
Brownsound Posted May 12, 2010 Posted May 12, 2010 http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/custom-sho...on-guitars.htmlIf it doesnt improve tone, its crap.
dewey finn Posted May 13, 2010 Posted May 13, 2010 For Les Paul chatting these guys are very cool:http://www.lespaulconsortium.com/forum/ind...2b0f96104c47dc1
Question
eightyfour
Anybody know what if any the technical differences are between the 58 and 59 reissues?
18 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.