elduave Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 Please place your order before the end of the year. No more Crowns after 12/31/07. Yup, even on Standards. This message approved by the home office.
Steve Haynie Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 Let me guess... Fender does not want to be responsible for guitars that have an inlay pattern that is virtually exclusive to Gibson.
silentman Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 End of an era. Maybe 10 years from now you can order them for $1000 upcharge a la boomers.
atquinn Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 Hmm, I'm kind of surprised they didn't do this right after they came up with the Victory inlays. Victories look surprisingly sweet on my Studio, but I still think they look a bit funny on Standards and Vectors. -Austin
seeker Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 Hmm, I'm kind of surprised they didn't do this right after they came up with the Victory inlays. Victories look surprisingly sweet on my Studio, but I still think they look a bit funny on Standards on Vectors. -AustinI like em on Studios also. Agree that Victories might look a bit odd on a Standard. Have always thought that parallelogram inlays that match the body's angle direction would be kinda cool.
sirDaniel Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 Postfender HAMER rule list:1. No Crown INLAYS2. tba3. tba4. tba5. tba6. tba7. tba8. tba9. tba
atquinn Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 Hmm, I'm kind of surprised they didn't do this right after they came up with the Victory inlays. Victories look surprisingly sweet on my Studio, but I still think they look a bit funny on Standards on Vectors. -AustinI like em on Studios also. Agree that Victories might look a bit odd on a Standard. Have always thought that parallelogram inlays that match the body's angle direction would be kinda cool.Personally, I think Boomers look sweet on both Standards and Vectors due to the body angles, but I guess that's just me.-Austin
DavidE Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 Please place your order before the end of the year. No more Crowns after 12/31/07. Yup, even on Standards. This message approved by the home office. The Home Office in Scottsdale, AZ?
BCR Greg Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 No more boomers, effective NOW. I was just told that on the phone yesterday.
Devnor Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 No more boomers, effective NOW. I was just told that on the phone yesterday.A small part of me died yesterday...
elduave Posted November 1, 2007 Author Posted November 1, 2007 Except on Watsons... You are correct, sir.
Feynman Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 I was sort of hoping a victory inlay SC would pop up on my WTB thread. Maybe I should switch to crowns. Pre-Fender, indeed.
atquinn Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 No more boomers, effective NOW. I was just told that on the phone yesterday.Now that is ridiculous! -Austin
AdmiralB Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 Why does everyone assume this is a Fender mandate? The other thread is full of "Hamer USA is a pimple on the ass" posts, now everyone assumes that the first action by FMIC after a very large acquisition is to dictate a change to the option list at Hamer USA?
Steve Haynie Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 Any other guesses as to why there will be no more crowns?
AdmiralB Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 Any other guesses as to why there will be no more crowns?Why would Fender would tell them to stop? And why no more boomerangs?Since Standards are the only guitars that have crowns as, well, standard...I'd posit that they're narrowing the inventory.
Feynman Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 It's much more fun to assign blame. Who needs facts? I blame Fender. I bet all those crown inlay offerings I have so far all just shot up in price.
DavidE Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 Why does everyone assume this is a Fender mandate? The other thread is full of "Hamer USA is a pimple on the ass" posts, now everyone assumes that the first action by FMIC after a very large acquisition is to dictate a change to the option list at Hamer USA?Because it's something other than Britney Spears?Actually, it makes sense from a Gibson-Fender intellectual property point of view.
murkat Posted November 1, 2007 Posted November 1, 2007 Why does everyone assume this is a Fender mandate? The other thread is full of "Hamer USA is a pimple on the ass" posts, now everyone assumes that the first action by FMIC after a very large acquisition is to dictate a change to the option list at Hamer USA?Actually, it makes sense from a Gibson-Fender intellectual property point of view.^ if that was the case... no more standards, Vee's, double cuts........ the handshake deal is no longer....
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.