Jump to content
Hamer Fan Club Message Center

Recommended Posts

Posted

That gap between the bridge and the tailpiece gives me pause.  

Why come it be like that? 

Posted

IF (IF!) I were going to give $11,000 for a guitar, that would be among the rarified half dozen contenders.

bbd7f33c-be96-436e-b056-ed5b37c9c143.jpeb660dd80-0ef0-4eae-8890-b6c954e70bb5.jpe

Odd most of the guitar shows wear but the top seems almost pristine. 

cbfb73f8-dffe-494e-87ad-18f80c38915b.jpe

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Hackubus said:

That gap between the bridge and the tailpiece gives me pause.  

Why come it be like that? 

Same here

Posted
10 hours ago, specialk said:

From the ad:

"This is serial number 0040 built by Paul Hammer in early 1976"

Was going to post that.

That, and that the stop tail placement bothers the shit out of me.

  • Like 5
Posted

Theory: re-topped after Kahler/trem-of-some-kind removal. Tailpiece studs moved back to avoid repair area.

The top is way too clean vs the wear on the back. IMHO. Cool guitar. Just a few weirdnesses for that kind of money.

...or I'm just smoking crack. 

  • Like 6
Posted
43 minutes ago, hamerhead said:

Theory: re-topped after Kahler/trem-of-some-kind removal. Tailpiece studs moved back to avoid repair area.

The top is way too clean vs the wear on the back. IMHO. Cool guitar. Just a few weirdnesses for that kind of money.

...or I'm just smoking crack. 

This ^^^

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, hamerhead said:

Theory: re-topped after Kahler/trem-of-some-kind removal. Tailpiece studs moved back to avoid repair area.

 I'm just smoking crack. 

Fuk'n crack smoker... 🤣

That was my first thought, but still doesn't explain why the tailstop is so far away. There are literally thousands of de-kahlerized guitars where the tailstops are in a normal position... you just fill the void with wood and it's solid... therefore, you can mount the post anywhere... 🤷‍♂️

  • Haha 3
Posted
27 minutes ago, Dave Scepter said:

I asked, and this was his response.

Screenshot_20260905_090648_Reverb.jpg

Screenshot_20260905_090639_Reverb.jpg

 

Bullshit.

The ad clearly says the guitar was made by Paul Hammer.

 

  • Haha 4
Posted

My personal concern "and it could be the photo angle" is the amount of fretboard real estate between the high and low E strings... The high E seems like pull offs may turn into fall offs 

Screenshot_20260905_104328_Reverb.jpg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Cool concept but the tail piece (as mentioned) is problematic. I'd have ZERO use for 3 p'ups but that just channels so much Ace Frehley and rarity coolness vibes...

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Dave Scepter said:

My personal concern "and it could be the photo angle" is the amount of fretboard real estate between the high and low E strings... The high E seems like pull offs may turn into fall offs 

Screenshot_20260905_104328_Reverb.jpg

100% the angle 

  • Like 2
Posted
22 minutes ago, veatch said:

I'm a derp. Who is this?  Looks like the same tailpiece spacing...

You and me both…

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...