WorstBandName Posted Friday at 08:10 PM Posted Friday at 08:10 PM https://reverb.com/item/101421628-hamer-standard-1976-tobacco-sunburst Just postd around 3:30 pm EST Friday 2 Quote
Hackubus Posted Friday at 08:35 PM Posted Friday at 08:35 PM That gap between the bridge and the tailpiece gives me pause. Why come it be like that? Quote
velorush Posted Friday at 09:05 PM Posted Friday at 09:05 PM IF (IF!) I were going to give $11,000 for a guitar, that would be among the rarified half dozen contenders. Odd most of the guitar shows wear but the top seems almost pristine. 1 Quote
ChugD Posted Friday at 10:02 PM Posted Friday at 10:02 PM Too much weird stuff with that sellers profile. 1 1 Quote
Steve Haynie Posted Friday at 11:56 PM Posted Friday at 11:56 PM Two feedbacks, one from 2015 and the other from 2020. Quote
specialk Posted Saturday at 01:06 AM Posted Saturday at 01:06 AM From the ad: "This is serial number 0040 built by Paul Hammer in early 1976" 6 Quote
maxprs Posted Saturday at 07:52 AM Posted Saturday at 07:52 AM 11 hours ago, Hackubus said: That gap between the bridge and the tailpiece gives me pause. Why come it be like that? Same here Quote
kizanski Posted Saturday at 11:58 AM Posted Saturday at 11:58 AM 10 hours ago, specialk said: From the ad: "This is serial number 0040 built by Paul Hammer in early 1976" Was going to post that. That, and that the stop tail placement bothers the shit out of me. 5 Quote
hamerhead Posted Saturday at 02:53 PM Posted Saturday at 02:53 PM Theory: re-topped after Kahler/trem-of-some-kind removal. Tailpiece studs moved back to avoid repair area. The top is way too clean vs the wear on the back. IMHO. Cool guitar. Just a few weirdnesses for that kind of money. ...or I'm just smoking crack. 6 Quote
hamerhead Posted Saturday at 02:55 PM Posted Saturday at 02:55 PM But only $75 shipping. That's a fucking deal. 5 Quote
stratacus Posted Saturday at 03:13 PM Posted Saturday at 03:13 PM The stoptail placement is a bridge too far. 2 8 Quote
Travis Posted Saturday at 03:37 PM Posted Saturday at 03:37 PM 43 minutes ago, hamerhead said: Theory: re-topped after Kahler/trem-of-some-kind removal. Tailpiece studs moved back to avoid repair area. The top is way too clean vs the wear on the back. IMHO. Cool guitar. Just a few weirdnesses for that kind of money. ...or I'm just smoking crack. This ^^^ 2 Quote
Dave Scepter Posted Saturday at 04:08 PM Posted Saturday at 04:08 PM I asked, and this was his response. 3 2 Quote
Dave Scepter Posted Saturday at 04:13 PM Posted Saturday at 04:13 PM 1 hour ago, hamerhead said: Theory: re-topped after Kahler/trem-of-some-kind removal. Tailpiece studs moved back to avoid repair area. I'm just smoking crack. Fuk'n crack smoker... 🤣 That was my first thought, but still doesn't explain why the tailstop is so far away. There are literally thousands of de-kahlerized guitars where the tailstops are in a normal position... you just fill the void with wood and it's solid... therefore, you can mount the post anywhere... 🤷♂️ 3 Quote
kizanski Posted Saturday at 04:36 PM Posted Saturday at 04:36 PM 27 minutes ago, Dave Scepter said: I asked, and this was his response. Bullshit. The ad clearly says the guitar was made by Paul Hammer. 4 Quote
Steve Haynie Posted Saturday at 05:14 PM Posted Saturday at 05:14 PM What does the factory log say? Quote
Dave Scepter Posted Saturday at 05:47 PM Posted Saturday at 05:47 PM My personal concern "and it could be the photo angle" is the amount of fretboard real estate between the high and low E strings... The high E seems like pull offs may turn into fall offs 2 1 Quote
diablo175 Posted Saturday at 05:57 PM Posted Saturday at 05:57 PM Cool concept but the tail piece (as mentioned) is problematic. I'd have ZERO use for 3 p'ups but that just channels so much Ace Frehley and rarity coolness vibes... 1 Quote
hamerhead Posted Saturday at 06:06 PM Posted Saturday at 06:06 PM 51 minutes ago, Steve Haynie said: What does the factory log say? 5 Quote
dgstandard Posted Saturday at 09:06 PM Posted Saturday at 09:06 PM Listing has ended. Wasn’t me! 3 Quote
Travis Posted Saturday at 09:28 PM Posted Saturday at 09:28 PM 3 hours ago, Dave Scepter said: My personal concern "and it could be the photo angle" is the amount of fretboard real estate between the high and low E strings... The high E seems like pull offs may turn into fall offs 100% the angle 2 Quote
veatch Posted yesterday at 12:01 AM Posted yesterday at 12:01 AM 2 hours ago, dgstandard said: Listing has ended. Wasn’t me! I'm a derp. Who is this? Looks like the same tailpiece spacing... Quote
Travis Posted yesterday at 12:24 AM Posted yesterday at 12:24 AM 22 minutes ago, veatch said: I'm a derp. Who is this? Looks like the same tailpiece spacing... You and me both… Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.