ptm1diver Posted December 29, 2014 Posted December 29, 2014 Down to 20 unclaimed numbers?GW has a few I'm sure.
cmatthes Posted December 29, 2014 Posted December 29, 2014 Limit one per customer in this run, so no.
bubs_42 Posted December 29, 2014 Posted December 29, 2014 Yes, lets not add anything Toxic to this nice, clean thread.
serial Posted December 29, 2014 Posted December 29, 2014 Down to 20 unclaimed numbers?GW has a few I'm sure.Who is 'GW'?
kizanski Posted December 29, 2014 Posted December 29, 2014 Down to 20 unclaimed numbers?GW has a few I'm sure.Who is 'GW'?I was wondering that myself?Gee Willikers?
tmsfo Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 E-|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------|B-|-----------------------------|-------------------3-------------------------|G-|-----------------------------|--------0-------2----------------------------|D-|--2--2-----------------------|-----2-------0-------------------------------|A-|--2--2--------------------0--|--3------------------------------------------|E-|--0--0---0--0--0---2--3------|---------------------------------------------|idongetit.
RobB Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 Last clue: “Ah’m in the middle, without any pla-han Ah’m a boy and ah’m a man..."
cmatthes Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 It's already been filled in. Very clever, Stonge!!
tmsfo Posted December 30, 2014 Posted December 30, 2014 oh. I don't play it like that. I play it like this:it's mostly the same, save the extra open E note and the open G. Shouldn't that be a octave C?Main RiffE5 C5 D5|------------------------------|-----------------------------------||------------------------------|-----------------------------------||------------------------------|----------5-----------------7------||--2-----2---------------------|------5----------------7--------7--||--2-----2------------------0--|-3----------------5----------------||--0-----0-----0---0--2---3----|-----------------------------------|
velorush Posted January 2, 2015 Author Posted January 2, 2015 Edited for recent exchanges in serial numbers.
BadgerDave Posted January 2, 2015 Posted January 2, 2015 I can now reveal that I've inherited the sweetest number.Henri RichardGreg Biffleand a reasonably talented QB often referred to as "Joe football" shared my number.42Oz in a lb.The number formerly known as BTMN
hikarateboy Posted January 2, 2015 Posted January 2, 2015 A very appropriate picture for this thread.
BTMN Posted January 2, 2015 Posted January 2, 2015 I can now reveal that I've inherited the sweetest number. Henri Richard Greg Biffle and a reasonably talented QB often referred to as "Joe football" shared my number. 42 Oz in a lb. The number formerly known as BTMN Aw man I forgot about those #16 factoids. I was caught on the 2-8s factor. Life IS Good! Sweet 16 DUH!!!
kizanski Posted January 2, 2015 Posted January 2, 2015 A very appropriate picture for this thread.This is the awesomeness!
velorush Posted January 2, 2015 Author Posted January 2, 2015 I can now reveal that I've inherited the sweetest number. Henri Richard Greg Biffle and a reasonably talented QB often referred to as "Joe football" shared my number. 42 Oz in a lb. The number formerly known as BTMN Much prefer 24 Or even 1000 to be simple, or 10 to be complicated but brief. Updating...
velorush Posted January 2, 2015 Author Posted January 2, 2015 A very appropriate picture for this thread. Whew, had that been a more overt profession of serial number and given the formula: ([serial] - 1) = HiKarateBoy you'd have revealed two for the post of one!
hikarateboy Posted January 2, 2015 Posted January 2, 2015 Whew, had that been a more overt profession of serial number and given the formula: ([serial] - 1) = HiKarateBoy you'd have revealed two for the post of one! I think I am following you being that I had previously stated that I would be one less than Serial but then again I never actually revealed that 0002 was indeed mine. I can understand that belief as the picture would imply that... or does it?
velorush Posted January 2, 2015 Author Posted January 2, 2015 Whew, had that been a more overt profession of serial number and given the formula: ([serial] - 1) = HiKarateBoy you'd have revealed two for the post of one! I think I am following you being that I had previously stated that I would be one less than Serial but then again I never actually revealed that 0002 was indeed mine. I can understand that belief as the picture would imply that... or does it? Yes, in the beginning we were accepting posting of numbers, images, riddles, clues, etc., as declaration of serial number assignment, and that to our entertainment and amusement. With Serial's posting "0003" and his subsequent declaration that posting of a number was not conclusive evidence of serial number assignment (to paraphrase POTUS 0042, "it depends on what the meaning of the [term] 0003, is") the threshold of acceptance was raised greatly, thereby thrusting the Registry into a new age of... enlightenment... or something like that. Yes, the uninformed (or dare we say, naive?) might see the photo and quickly conclude 0002 is yours, but to quote one of great consequence in the Hamer history, that would be "too obvious!"
hikarateboy Posted January 3, 2015 Posted January 3, 2015 Here is the one thing we know for sure that ALL can appreciate. Serial number stamping means that guitars are starting to come off the line! It has been quite fast when you think about how long a custom order guitar usually takes but the excitement has made it feel much longer for all involved. I predict we will be hearing about happy new owners almost weekly very soon. My one piece of advice for anyone who didn't get into the initial run, but is interested in owning a guitar that was made specifically for them, is to contact Mike and to see how affordable a custom guitar that is spec'd exactly how you want it, really is when compared to the prices of a set neck off the rack Gibson, PRS, or similar instrument.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.